A cross-party group of MPs and peers has identified human rights risks posed by artificial intelligence (AI) which existing laws, they argue, are ill-equipped to cover.
The Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) published a report calling for a new bill on AI to "address the scale and seriousness" of such threats.
… %!s()
"Nowhere in the world, including the UK, has a current legislative and regulatory approach to AI that is fit for purpose," said Labour MP and committee chair Alex Sobel.
A government spokesperson said AI is "advancing at an extraordinary pace" and is creating both opportunities and risks.
They said: "We're leading global efforts to test and understand AI, with the best-resourced security institute in the world, that will help us develop the standards and safeguards necessary to keep people safe."
On Saturday, the head of the US AI company Anthropic, Dario Amodei, proposed a plan calling for the regulation of AI.
Amodei's plan includes global regulation, industry-wide regulation and independent monitoring of AI models as they are developed.
He also urged the pace of development to be slowed down and the bosses of two rival AI firms, Sam Altman of OpenAI and Elon Musk, said they agreed with him.
One human rights concern raised in recent years is that AI can display biases against particular groups if trained on large datasets scraped from the internet which can include racist, sexist and other undesirable material.
AI could also be used to create and spread misinformation.
In a summary of its 100-page report, external, the JCHR points out that AI has been responsible for numerous abuses of human rights.
It cites as examples the use of AI to create sexualised images of women and girls and scanning people's faces without their consent.
The JCHR advocates the creation of a "single, independent AI oversight body... on a statutory basis".
It argues that the current legal framework which applies to AI is "fragmented and difficult to navigate", "leaving gaps in protection".
"The AI Bill should establish a regulatory regime that classifies different risk levels and mandate more demanding obligations for higher risk AI systems and models," it says.
"Obligations should be placed on all stages of the AI lifecycle, ensuring those responsible in the supply chain for designing, amending and utilising AI systems are aware of their obligations and they are effectively addressed.
"Some uses of AI should be prohibited outright because they are incompatible with human rights. Potential areas for action include subliminal techniques, and inappropriate use of profiling or biometric data."
"AI is heralded as an unprecedented era of technological development with the potential to transform our lives for better or for worse," said Sobel.
"It is moving with such speed and complexity that its impact is hard to accurately predict. What is clear is that at present we are unprepared to deal with its consequences however potentially dire they may be."
The JCHR's 12 members are drawn from both Houses of Parliament and they currently include MPs and peers from the Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties.
Monday's report comes amid growing general anxiety over the challenges AI poses.
Jacob Coxon, an AI researcher who quit Anthropic, told the BBC this weekend that staff developing the systems were "genuinely frightened" for the future of humanity.
An Anthropic spokesperson told BBC News that it was building "models with some of the strongest safeguards in the industry". %!s()
Good morning. Nigel Farage has a confirmed talent for upending the laws of political gravity, and this weekend has been no exception, as he declared himself “humbled” by twodonations of £36m each from cryptocurrency tycoons Ben Delo and Christopher Harborne.
… %!s()
I’d shoehorn a joke about buses in here but, honestly, this feels too consequential for that.
The largest single donations in British political history were made after a dismal party conference, the substance of which was all but obscured by the financial scandals engulfing Reform.
As the financial dubiety continues, and the numbers of millions tick upwards to seem almost meaningless, it might be tempting to roll your eyes and focus elsewhere – but this is not the time to look away. These are gamechanging donations, transformative if used effectively at this stage in the election cycle, just as Labour has regained its confidence and the Tories are contemplating a comeback.
As a bill that could stop donations like this in their tracks returns to the Lords later today, I spoke to Jessica Elgot, the Guardian’s deputy political editor, about what these millions mean and why they matter. First, a wrap-up of this weekend’s headlines.
Weekend roundup
Economy | Former chancellor George Osborne said Britain’s economy had “fallen off a cliff” since Brexit – and that rejoining the European Union’s customs union would be the fastest route to recovery.
Technology | Sam Altman and Elon Musk backed Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei’s call to “slow the pace” of AI development. Amodei had cautioned that an AI swarm could otherwise become capable of “taking over the entire internet” within a year.
Sweden | With most of the votes counted, Sweden’s national election remained too close to call on Sunday night, with left-wing parties holding a lead of just a single seat according to a partial tally by the election authority.
Ukraine | A train carrying Boris Johnson and the former CIA chief David Petraeus may have been the target of a Russian drone strike that hit a train engine near the Poland-Ukraine border, according to Ukrainian Railways.
Travel | The air traffic control outage that caused thousands of flights to be grounded across the UK earlier in the week was caused by a military aircraft entering “spurious” flight data into the system, according to a report.
In depth: More money, more problems?
‘Competitive spirit’ … Christopher Harborne, Nigel Farage and Ben Delo. Photograph: LPN/Getty Images/Ben Delo Foundation
Let’s start with more detail on the donations, by businessmen who have amassed astronomical fortunes trading in cryptocurrency. Ben Delo, a previous Reform donor, has given £36m. Delo was convicted in the US in 2022 for failing to implement adequate anti-money-laundering controls in his trillion-dollar cryptocurrency business BitMEX, before being pardoned by Donald Trump last year.
(A brief note here on how that story came to light: the Sunday Times approached Reform and Farage after a confidential source told them that Delo had donated to the party. Soon after, the Telegraph published an opinion piece by Delo himself, announcing the donation and trouncing the Sunday Times scoop. As Sunday Times political editor Ben Riley-Smith noted on X: “A fundamental part of political reporting – approaching for comment before publishing – just totally breaks down if this is what happens. Bad for both sides: Will increase the chance of inaccuracies.” Reform has used the same tactic with the Guardian, as we talked about in a previous newsletter.)
Less than 24 hours later, another crypto donor was troubling the Telegraph’s op-ed page: this time Christopher Harborne – whose previous £5m gift to Farage is the onecurrently subject to a parliamentary standards investigation – announcing he had likewise donated £36m, saying: “My competitive spirit inspired me to match [Delo].”
Taken together, these donations are unprecedented in British political history: £72m is bigger than the total sum spent by the seven largest parties in the last general election (about £67.9m) and almost double the total donations to all political parties so far this year (about £41.8m).
Are these donations legal?
“There’s nothing wrong with these donations that we know of,” says Jessica, her final four words doing a lot of heavy lifting in present circumstances. The Metropolitan police is conducting an inquiry into Reform’s finances and Farage is facing a parliamentary standards investigation into that £5m Harborne gift, made before he was first elected an MP in 2024 and first revealed by the Guardian. Reform and Farage have denied any wrongdoing.
It’s a legal requirement for every party to rigorously check the sources of donations, and, doing the media rounds yesterday, Reform’s economics spokesperson Robert Jenrick was sounding supremely confident that the donations were “entirely in line with the law as it is and, as far as we know, what it is going to be in the future”.
Jenrick was referencing the representation of the people bill, going through parliament, which will bring in more stringent rules about foreign donations. Gifts to political parties from Britons living abroad or those who have returned to the country within the past 12 months will be capped at £100,000 a year, with the rules backdated to March. Delo has recently moved back to Britain from Hong Kong, while Harborne is a citizen of the UK and Thailand.
I don’t have space to get into it here, but if you’re curious about the path to becoming a crypto billionaire and the people who get trampled along the way, I’d recommend the actor and crypto investigator Ben McKenzie’s excellent film Everybody Is Lying to You for Money. (Yes, he’s Ryan in The OC).
How could Reform spend the money?
Reform has already vastly scaled up its party infrastructure since the general election, moving to new offices in London’s Millbank Tower, once synonymous with New Labour election operations. Press officers, graphic designers, videographers and regional organisers have augmented staffing capacity, but their wider policy offering is still weak. An injection of cash will probably mean more hires to address this, and perhaps even drafting legislation to boost Farage’s projection of a party that’s ready for government.
Reform is expected to install campaign managers and branch coordinators in hundreds of seats across the country – as their list of 60-plus job vacancies indicates.
And if this newsletter gig doesn’t work out for me, I might throw my bunnet in for the senior writer role advertised here – the application requires a 500-word letter, written in the style of Zia Yusuf, “setting out how the political class broke Britain and how Reform UK will fix it”.
The donations also promise a massive boost to Reform’s visibility – they can pay for the big “air war” expenses incurred in coming byelections and council elections next year, more locally targeted online advertising and billboards, as well as getting creative with its TV studios.
Reform now has the money to focus on labour-intensive data gathering in target constituencies as well, says Jessica, who predicts it will be “transformative” for the party.
“You’ve got enough money now to spend on the granular and expensive work of going around every single constituency in the country making sure your data about voters, and non-voters, is bang on. And if you’re a party that wants to show that you’re on the march, they’ve got the momentum, you can dominate the airwaves, dominate people’s social media feeds.”
Will this prompt a rethink on a cap for all donations?
Labour MPs’ WhatsApp chats have been popping off over the weekend, Jessica reports, with anger that the government did not act last week to restrict domestic donations in the elections bill. Stella Creasy, the Labour MP for Walthamstow, pulled her amendment proposing an annual cap of £100,000 after Andy Burnham dropped his support for it, following intensive lobbying from the party’s trade union backers, who argued it would undermine their ability to donate to the party.
But the bill has its second reading in the Lords later today and, yesterday, communities secretary Angela Rayner suggested that the government was still considering amendments and that “it’s not as simple as we’re saying we won’t put a cap”.
As Sunday turned into Monday, some unions appeared to be shifting their opposition while Labour MPs and donors were urging the government to look again at party funding rules. But Reform argues that – as a relatively new political force – it needs this cash injection to level the playing field with other parties and their far longer-standing donor arrangements.
What about an early election?
As Jessica reminds me, Reform will be able to splash its cash in the coming months because many restrictions on party spending don’t kick in until a general election is called. “Other parties are not spending that money now because they don’t have it. And their donors are not giving money at this stage in the cycle. So they won’t have any competition for those eyeballs whatsoever.”
There’s growing chatter in Westminster that – if economic growth continues to inch upwards and Reform remains static in the polls – Burnham may go for an early summer general election next year. (With a note of caution from Jessica that there will probably be a backlash from hundreds of Labour MPs on course to lose their seats.)
A major consideration for the prime minister is, of course, Reform – which remains, in recent polls, a couple of points behind Labour and a similar amount ahead of the Tories. According to Jenrick on Sunday, these donations enable his party to be “battle ready”, whatever Burnham decides. Meanwhile, Labour sent out an “urgent” fundraising appeal over the weekend, warning that Reform could “simply drown Labour’s message out in elections to come”.
Clearly, £72m in cash is good for Reform. “But whether it re-energises the party, and voters think, ‘People are willing to give this money millions of pounds because they offer a radical reset and I want that, too’ or whether it adds to that perception of a party being bought by billionaires, it’s hard to say.”
skip past newsletter promotion
after newsletter promotion
Crucially, it keeps everybody talking about Reform’s finances. After a summer marred by scandal, internal divisions and a damp squib byelection, and at a point when Farage’s own popularity ratings have plummeted and support for the party has stalled, that is last place Reform wants to be.
The week to come
Monday | First ministers of Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland will meet in Cardiff to discuss moves towards self-determination across the nations.
Tuesday | The final report of the Thirwall Inquiry into events at the neonatal unit where Lucy Letby worked will be published. Letby was sentenced to 15 whole-life terms for murdering seven infants and attempting to murder seven others.
Thursday | Canada’s prime minister, Mark Carney, will address the European parliament.
What else we’ve been enjoying
Our democracy won’t survive the death of reading, writes John Harris. Illustration: Ben Jennings/The Guardian
Much of the hand-wringing around the death of reading can seem uncircumstantial, but not this excellent column from John Harris on what it could mean for the future of our democracy in a time of “nonsense and poison”. Charlie Lindlar, newsletters team
Anyone who, like me, has returned to the place they grew up to see if mere proximity can transport them, in spirit, back to their youth will inhale this thoughtful and emotive collection of mini-essays by Deborah Levy, Julia Samuels and other novelists on revisiting their childhood homes. Here be ghosts. Craille Maguire Gillies, newsletters team
Our This is how we do it series is a must-read, and this piece from a couple on making time for sex alongside their open relationship and raising three young kids is no exception (not least to understand how they possibly find the time). Charlie
Sport
Alexander Zverev celebrates with the US Open trophy after beating Ben Shelton. Photograph: Robert Deutsch/IMAGN IMAGES/Reuters
Tennis | Alexander Zverev, the No 1 seed, beat Ben Shelton 6-3, 7-6 (2), 5-7, 6-2,the American’s hopes dashed in his first grand slam final.
Golf | The captain Anna Nordqvist led Europe to a 15-13 victory in the Solheim Cup a month after retiring from competitive golf.
Football | Sonia Bompastor’s Chelsea dominated in a 5-0 away victory against Eva Olid’s Manchester United, while Pro Ref admitted Erling Haaland’s winner in Sunday’s Manchester derby should not have counted after the VAR ruled Enzo Fernández was not interfering with play in the buildup.
The front pages
Photograph: The Guardian
“Revealed: true scale of Britain’s involvement in the slave trade”, is the Guardian’s splash today.
The Telegraph leads with “Hospitality chiefs urge PM to cut VAT” and the Express says “Labour tourist tax will hammer seaside B&Bs”. The i Paper’s headline is “Reform’s £72m crypto bonanza sparks Labour donations row”, Metro says “Labour threat to Reform’s £72m windfall”, while the Mirror’s take is “Bitcon?”. The FT’s splash is “Trump rejects industry calls for brake on AI over fears of losing race to China”.
The Sun has “Boris flees Vlad drone blitz”, the Mail asks “Did Putin drone target Boris and top security officials?”
Today in Focus
Warnings over AI are not new. Photograph: Dado Ruvić/Reuters
AI isn’t going to end humanity … right?
Ten per cent. That’s the risk, more or less, claimed a high-profile AI developer last week, that the technology wipes humanity out in the next decade. “I think it’s a crossover moment for the AI safety story because this has been for a long time talked about inside the AI world”, says our UK technology editor, Robert Booth, “but now, the general public and the political class have become increasingly concerned about it.” So how worried, asks Annie Kelly, should we be?
Cartoon of the day | Tom Gauld
Illustration: Tom Gauld/The Guardian
The Upside
A bit of good news to remind you that the world’s not all bad
‘People seem really happy it’s open again.’ The Au Bon Accueil restaurant in Saint-Martin-sur-Ouanne. Photograph: Ed Alcock/The Guardian
“In bistros and cafes, people don’t just eat and drink, they catch up with each other, meet new people, debate, laugh, read, write and sometimes fall in love,” said Alain Fontaine of Paris’s Le Mesturet bistro. Yet where once there were an estimated 500,000 cafe-bistros dotted throughout France, there are now only about 30,000 to 40,000. But one group of local campaigners in the northern Burgundy community of Saint-Martin-sur-Ouanne has saved one such establishment, and in the process, make their village livable again.
After a successful community-led campaign to reopen it, Au Bon Acceuil cafe-bistro has been brought back to life – and every table is taken. As the village mayor, Hervé Chapuis, put it: “Our aim is to keep this kind of business open to support the social fabric. It’s part of village life and people missed it. Now, village life has returned to its proper rhythm.”
Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday
Bored at work?
And finally, the Guardian’s puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow.
14 years later, the most gruesome Batman movie still packs a punch. And it's free on YouTube.
Image: Warner Bros.
There are plenty of Batman stories that focus predominantly on what makes Bruce Wayne good at being Batman, but fewer are interested in asking whether he should still be Batman at all. Age has a funny way of changing the shape of a superhero story, especially when the hero in question has spent decades convincing himself that the next night, the next villain, the next crisis will be the one that finally makes him hang up the mantle. Some versions of Batman are defined by his gadgets, his world-class detective work, or his sheer physicality. One of the best instead starts with the idea that perhaps the body underneath the suit simply can't keep up with nightly crime-fighting anymore.
… %!s()
Case in point is Batman: The Dark Knight Returns, the 2012 and 2013 animated adaptations of Frank Miller's landmark 1986 comic that are currently free on YouTube. Directed by Jay Oliva and featuring Peter Weller as a much older Bruce Wayne, the two-part film collection isn’t your typical Batman soirée. In the wake of his years-long retirement, crime has flourished, new gangs have taken over the streets, and Gotham is generally steeped in mayhem. Bruce, meanwhile, is enduring a hollow retirement, attempting (but largely failing) to numb his repressed rage with alcohol and reckless thrill-seeking. But when the vicious Mutant gang pushes Gotham past its breaking point and a supposedly reformed Harvey Dent relapses into terrorism, the psychological dam bursts, compelling a grizzled, 55-year-old Wayne to resurrect the Caped Crusader.
Why The Dark Knight Returns is worth watching
What makes The Dark Knight Returns so compelling is how little interest it has in making Bruce's comeback look easy. This isn't a Batman who emerges from the shadows of retirement looking exactly as he did 20 years earlier. Every punch leaves a lasting mark, and every chase takes something out of him. His reflexes aren't what they used to be, and the film repeatedly makes you wonder whether his determination is actually bravery, obsession, or something closer to a subconscious death wish. Weller's performance helps sell that distinction. His Batman sounds worn down, gravelly and stubborn, like a man who has spent too long trying to convince himself he still has one good fight left in him.
The result is a version of Batman who almost feels like an urban legend returning to a city that has moved on without him. The film understands the power of simply letting people react to Batman's presence. Some see him as a criminal. Others still view him as a savior. The news media transforms his return into a spectacle, while the authorities increasingly view him as a problem that needs to be solved. As with many of the greatest Batman flicks, Gotham becomes a character unto itself, with its streets, gangs, and desperate citizens giving Batman a reason to keep pushing forward.
Image: WB
It also helps that The Dark Knight Returns isn't content to give Bruce the same relationships we've seen countless times before. His return creates room for a new generation, most notably Carrie Kelley (Ariel Winter), a street-smart teenager who adopts the Robin mantle and becomes the catalyst for his renewed mission. Their dynamic provides the film with vital emotional warmth without softening Bruce into a conventional mentor. Carrie is bright, impulsive, and energetic, contrasting with Bruce’s cynical perfectionism. That tension pays off in the brutal fight against the Mutant leader: When Bruce's hubris nearly gets him slaughtered, Carrie dives into the fray and hauls his broken body into the Batmobile. Later, when he gruffly acknowledges her with a blunt "you're a good soldier," it speaks volumes about their bond — a passing of the torch forged through mutual survival rather than hand-holding.
Then there is the kinetic escalation of it all. What begins as a bruised 55-year-old bloodying his knuckles against alleyway muggers rapidly spirals into a global catastrophe. The narrative continuously raises the stakes, jumping from the violent anarchy of the Mutant gang to a catatonic Joker waking up on live television to slaughter a studio audience, and then to the brink of Cold War nuclear annihilation over Corto Maltese. By the time a high-altitude nuclear blast triggers an EMP that plunges Gotham into a freezing, apocalyptic blackout, the film expands far beyond a simple vigilante story. Batman responds not by hiding, but by riding a horse through burning streets, marshaling a civilian militia to maintain order while the rest of the country collapses into panic. The movie keeps widening its scope without ever losing sight of its central, terrifying question: How far is Bruce Wayne willing to drag the world to prove that Batman is still necessary?
The Dark Knight Returns still looks amazing
Image: Warner Bros.
For a superhero movie released in 2012, The Dark Knight Returns can feel remarkably unlike the polished comic-book blockbusters that surrounded it. It's grimy, violent, and occasionally uncomfortable, and it isn't particularly interested in reassuring you that its hero is making the right choices. The animation may not reproduce every detail of Miller's distinctive artwork, but it captures the story's oppressive atmosphere and gives its biggest confrontations room to land.
Best of all, the movie understands that Batman is most interesting when the mask starts to look less like a costume and more like a burden. Watching an older Bruce Wayne pick it back up is thrilling, but watching him struggle with everything that comes with it is what makes this story stick unlike most other Batman tales. If you've never seen The Dark Knight Returns, it's an unusually thoughtful Batman movie collection hiding inside what initially looks like another superhero beat-'em-up, ripe for fans of Batman: The Animated Series and Batman Beyond.
Batman: The Dark Knight Returns is streaming on YouTube%!s()
Genta Koja beat two-term incumbent Denny Tamaki, who wants a major US military base to be moved out of Okinawa.
Genta Koja has defeated two-term incumbent Denny Tamaki in the race for governor of Japan’s southernmost prefecture, potentially ending more than a decade of opposition to a United States military build-up in the region.
… %!s()
He won 59 percent of the vote in Sunday’s election, officials announced on Monday.
Recommended Stories
list of 3 items
list 1 of 3Japan protests as Russia’s Putin visits disputed Kuril Islands
list 2 of 3Japan builds up its ‘southern shield’ as faith in US security cover falters
list 3 of 3What is Japan’s new intelligence agency, and why is Tokyo building it?
end of list
Koja, a former deputy mayor of Okinawa’s capital, Naha, was backed by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s Liberal Democratic Party. He beat Tamaki, 66, who has long pushed for a major US military base to be moved out of Okinawa.
The 42-year-old will become the youngest Okinawa governor since the prefecture was returned to Japan from US rule in 1972. He will also become its first governor born after the reversion.
His election could end Okinawa’s legal efforts to block the relocation of US Marines from the Futenma air base to a new facility at Henoko on the prefecture’s main island, according to Masaaki Gabe, a professor emeritus at the University of the Ryukyus.
Gabe also said it may make it easier to expand military access to airports and ports.
“Koja could reasonably be expected to approve their designation, opening wholly civilian facilities to military use,” Gabe added.
Koja’s victory comes as Takaichi prepares to unveil a new national security strategy this year that is expected to accelerate Japan’s biggest military build-up since World War II.
Her administration said increased defence spending was necessary to deter China from using military force to advance its territorial ambitions in East Asia.
Okinawa forms part of what military planners call the first island chain, a string of territory stretching from Japan through the Philippines that constrains China’s access to the western Pacific.
Yonaguni Island, Japan’s westernmost territory, lies 110km (68 miles) east of Taiwan. Beijing claims Taiwan as its own territory and has stepped up military activity around the democratically governed island.
Tensions between Tokyo and Beijing have risen since Takaichi said last year that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could also threaten Japan and trigger a military response by Tokyo. %!s()
Lorenzo Simonelli, CEO of Baker Hughes, speaks during an interview with CNBC on the floor at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City, U.S., September 4, 2025.
… %!s()
Jeenah Moon | Reuters
Baker Hughes has yet to see higher borrowing costs slow investment in major energy projects, with its chief executive pointing to robust demand for natural gas and power from the global buildout of artificial intelligence infrastructure.
"We haven't seen a slowdown, and the bankability is really based on the offtake agreements that are in place, as well as the outlook of energy demand," Chairman and CEO Lorenzo Simonelli told CNBC at the Gastech conference in Bangkok.
Financing remains an important consideration for projects, Simonelli said, but rising energy needs from population growth, industry and data centers continue to underpin investment.
"Energy demand is not necessarily going to slow down with the increasing population, with the increasing linkage between industrial outcomes of data centers and AI, it's intrinsically linked with energy supply and energy sources," he said. "So we haven't seen that as of yet, and we continue to monitor it."
Simonelli's comments come as the Iran war has disrupted Middle Eastern energy flows and sent oil prices back above $100 a barrel, adding to concerns over inflation and borrowing costs.
The conflict has also disrupted natural gas markets, with restrictions on shipping through the Strait of Hormuz threatening LNG supplies from Qatar, one of the world's largest exporters.
watch now
Simonelli said high prices themselves can spur the investment needed to eventually bring additional supply to market.
"It's 'full steam ahead' with the aspect of looking beyond the short term, and obviously high pricing also leads to investment today, which will lead to supply coming in tomorrow," he said.
Baker Hughes expects prices ultimately to remain range-bound and sees little risk that a coming wave of LNG supply will create a prolonged glut. The company estimates that installed LNG capacity will need to reach 900 million tons per annum by 2035 to meet future demand.
AI is emerging as an increasingly important source of that demand. Simonelli said Baker Hughes does not expect the rapid expansion of data centers to slow, even as concerns grow over their electricity and water consumption.
"We think there won't be a slowdown," he said, adding that Baker Hughes is increasing capacity to meet demand.
In Southeast Asia, grid constraints are also leading some data-center operators toward behind-the-meter and distributed power generation, an area where Baker Hughes provides equipment.
Simonelli sees natural gas playing a central role in meeting those growing electricity needs. Baker Hughes has just over $37 billion in backlog, including demand tied to gas infrastructure, data-center power generation and LNG, he said.
"As you look at natural gas, it's not a transition fuel; it's a destination fuel," he said. "We're in an energy demand decade, and gas is central to it." %!s()