gshc2020.com

Without the electric Anthony Elanga, the visitors offered much less of a threat and could not handle the relentless press from the home side, led by the imperious Dominic Calvert-Lewin.

Unfortunately he is injured. We need to investigate further and in more detail to find out how long he will be out. We will miss him and hope he is back to play quickly. It could be [long-term]. We hope not. He will get another MRI next week and we will see.

• As it happened | Teams | Stats | Watch FREE PL highlights
• Latest news and rumours: Leeds | Newcastle
• Got Sky? Watch Premier League games LIVE on your phone📱
• Not got Sky? Latest Sky Sports deals or stream Premier League games with no contract📺

Leeds felt slighted when Matias Fernandez-Pardo, making his first start for his new club, avoided punishment for an alleged 'handball' inside the penalty area. That was soon forgotten as the hosts' dominance soon paid off.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

There was an element of luck to their first, as Ao Tanaka's shot deflected off two Newcastle defenders with the last touch coming off Lewis Miley to wrong-foot Lukas Hornicek.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

That then led to the Calvert-Lewin show truly beginning. The striker thought he had his eighth career goal against the Magpies with a bullet header three minutes later. However, replays showed the ball had last come off team-mate Jayden Bogle, meaning he had to settle for the assist.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The Leeds No 9 wasn't to be denied his next goal, bulldozing his way into the penalty area before calmly slotting home a third before the break.

The floodgates remained firmly open after half-time, with Noah Okafor adding a fourth - and the pick of the bunch. The forward produced a delightful weak-foot volley on the bounce, sending it arrowing into the bottom corner.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Bazoumana Toure grabbed a late consolation, but it did little to take the gloss off a thoroughly one-sided display. The result leaves Leeds sitting third at the end of the fourth round of fixtures - their highest position at this stage of a season since the 2000/01 campaign.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The key moments from Elland Road

2: NO PENALTY! Fernandez-Pardo avoids conceding spot-kick for alleged ‘handball.’

14: SAVE! Hornicek makes a top drawer save from close range to deny Bogle.

25: SAVE! Bogle again threatens as he stings the palms of Hornicek with vicious attempt.

32: GOAL! Tanaka’s deflected strike comes off TWO Newcastle players before beating Hornicek.

35: GOAL! Two in three minutes as Bogle gets last touch from Calvert-Lewin's bullet header.

41: SAVE! Best chance of the half for Newcastle as Barnes is denied from close range.

45+1: GOAL! Calvert-Lewin can’t be stopped as he finally gets his goal.

59: GOAL! Okafor gets in on the act with stunning strike on the bounce.

89: GOAL! No clean sheet for Leeds as Toure adds late consolation.

Farke hails 'outstanding' Calvert-Lewin

Leeds boss Daniel Farke speaking with Sky Sports:

“I wasn’t happy that we allowed them to score one goal. But, it doesn’t take anything away from the fact that my boys were brilliant and we fully deserved to win the game. There’s no such thing as a perfect performance though, and this is one of the rare points I have to criticise.

“We have energy, quality, good structure in and out of possession. We have a good fitness level, also. It’s not just the will, otherwise whoever had the strong will would always win the game. We have to have the right triggers and everyone needs to be spot on. It’s lots of work on the training ground to be that compact and intense.

On Dominic Calvert-Lewin:

“He’s in outstanding shape and he plays with lots of confidence. I expect him to lead the group and he’s taken the responsibility.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

“His work rate is top. It’s not just scoring the goals. The way he plays for us is outstanding. He’s definitely one of the stand out strikers in the league.”

Jaissle: We didn't match Leeds physically

Newcastle boss Matthias Jaissle speaking with Sky Sports:

"That’s the Premier League. It was clear from the start and I have said many times we will have ups and downs and challenges along the way. Tonight, we faced that challenge. It’s really tough. Difficult to digest, but this is a chance to learn because there’s not long until the next match at home to show the right reaction.

"You need to bring the fundamentals on the pitch against a physical and strong team. Leeds are so intense, especially at home and we couldn’t match that physicality in the first half. That was a key element. No excuses, we have to learn from it.

"Injuries are also a challenge that we need to overcome and will. This is the message I have given to the players. There will be no issue with confidence."

Carragher: Newcastle got beaten up

Jamie Carragher on Monday Night Football:

"Leeds are fifth in the Premier League table since December. That should make Newcastle feel better as it has been a bad night for them when the world was watching. They have been beaten up by a really good Premier League team.

"It will be a tough season at times for Newcastle with the manager and young players finding their feet in the Premier League. They just got beaten up."

On Dominic Calvert-Lewin:

"Calvert-Lewin was unplayable. One of the greatest sights in football is seeing a centre-forward rise above everyone and attack the ball.

"Look how high his legs are. I don't think there is a better player in the air in the Premier League."

Big learning curve for Jaissle

Sky Sports News' Keith Downie on X:

"That has to be a huge learning curve for Newcastle tonight. Looking at the team sheet for that opening game against Liverpool, with a midfield two and Yoane Wissa in the No 10, it looked like they were going to get overpowered.

"They didn't. Perhaps it was the emotion of the Kevin Keegan tributes, maybe it was because it was the opening game, or perhaps it was the Alexander Isak motivation. There was a lot going on that day.

"But Leeds away on a Monday night, you need physicality & runners. Even a midfield three of Bruno Guimaraes-Sandro Tonali-Joelinton would find that a tough match tonight.

"Newcastle were bullied by Leeds' physicality and numerical advantage in the engine room.

"It's a long season, and it's been a very good start, but that's a real eye opener for the the new Newcastle manager."

What the result means and next fixtures...

• Leeds fixtures
• Newcastle fixtures
• Premier League fixtures

Rate the players...

Monterosa

This content is provided by Monterosa, which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Monterosa cookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.

Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Monterosa cookies. To view this content you can use the button below to allow Monterosa cookies for this session only.

An unsigned ruling by a majority of the Supreme Court said the administration "is unlikely to succeed on the merits of its challenge to the" preliminary injunction issued by a Boston federal court judge preventing the USPS rule from being used in November's elections nationwide.

The decision comes less than two months before Election Day for contests that will determine which political party controls each chamber of Congress. President Donald Trump's fellow Republicans hold slim majorities in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a Trump appointee, concurred with the ruling in a statement that said, "there is at least a fair prospect that the final rule falls within the Postal Service's statutory authority."

"But applying the rule in the 2026 elections would be arbitrary and capricious in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act because state and local election officials do not have sufficient time to reasonably implement the rule before the elections," Kavanaugh added. "For that reason, I concur in the denial of the application for stay."

Two of Kavanaugh's fellow conservatives on the nine-justice court, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, dissented from the decision to reject a stay of the injunction against the Postal Service rule.

That rule, which implemented an executive order issued by Trump in March, established new standards for ballot envelopes, required states to create lists of voters who were eligible to obtain mail ballots, and required states to take those ballots to a Postal Service facility for compliance checks.

Alito, in his written dissent, said that some of the plaintiffs who had sued to challenge the Postal Service's rule lacked legal standing to do so, "while the remainder are pursuing a claim that this Court has recently called a 'Hail Mary pass' that 'rarely succeeds.'"

"The Government has a strong interest in enforcing the rule, and implementing it will also 'enhance the visibility of Federal Ballot Mail' in order to better detect election fraud," Alito wrote.

"On the other side of the balance, the plaintiff States invoke the practical effects of implementing the rule close to the midterm elections. I take that problem very seriously, but it is not enough to convince me to deny the application."

Celina Stewart, CEO of the League of Women Voters, one of the plaintiffs in the case, said in a statement, "Today, the Supreme Court refused to allow the federal government to throw our elections into chaos just weeks before Election Day."

"The Postal Service exists to deliver Americans' mail — not to rewrite election rules, demand voters' personal information, or decide which ballots make it through the system," Stewart said. "This was an extraordinary attempt to interfere with voting in all 50 states, and voters should never have been put in this position. Voters should never be caught in the middle of a political power warfare."

This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates. %!s()

And, what is a legitimate donation and what isn't?

It is worth setting out the law, in broad terms, now and how the government hopes to change it.

Right now, there is no limit on how much anyone, living in the UK or abroad, can give to a British political party as long as the individual is registered to vote in the UK.

But the government has been planning a change in the law for months, which would limit donations from Brits abroad to £100,000 each per year, backdated to 25 March this year.

But, crucially, the law hasn't changed yet and some of the key details in that proposed new law - such as what residency requirements would need to be passed to be classified as no longer being abroad - haven't been decided yet.

The reason for that date, 25 March, ministers argue, is that is the day a review by the retired civil servant Philip Rycroft was published,, external the first recommendation of which was that there should be "an annual cap on political donations from British voters living abroad".

On that same day, the then-cabinet minister Steve Reed told the Commons, external that cap would be £100,000 per year. He also added that it would "apply retrospectively" from that date onwards, even though the law at the time, and indeed now, has not yet changed.

Two big questions arise from this plan: is it proportionate to limit what British folk abroad can donate to UK political parties, given they are arguably less invested in the country than people living here?

And is it unfair, even morally questionable, to pass a law, but then backdate when its impact begins?

Fast forward to the last few days and along come these colossal donations from Ben Delo and Christopher Harborne, two cryptocurrency billionaires who until recently lived in Hong Kong and Thailand respectively.

They have both now returned to the UK.

In his first interview since these donations became public, Nigel Farage told me unequivocally that the money from both men was legal under the law as it stands now.

But he was equivocal when I asked him if they would legal under the law the government hopes to pass shortly.

"Both these donations are 100% compliant with the law today, of that there is no question whatsoever," Farage told me.

Ah, today, I pointed out.

"Retrospectively declaring donations illegal - that simply cannot be," he pressed on, adding "you cannot confiscate money that has been given legally within the law as it stands."

That is a political, perhaps moral argument, but not a legal one - if the government changes the law, the law of the land will have changed, possibly with consequences for whether those donations are legal.

We don't know, because Reform won't tell us, precisely when the two men relocated to the UK. Nor do we know, because the government hasn't decided yet, what relocating - residency - would look like legally.

Would it be being on the electoral roll at a UK address? Would it be being resident in the UK for tax purposes?

The Communities Minister Baroness Taylor told the Lords that Brits returning from abroad and wanting to donate without limit "must demonstrate a genuine and ongoing connection to the United Kingdom" and the government is "considering how we will strengthen the residency requirements, including ensuring that the length of time spent in the UK aligns with broader government policy".

In other words the hurdles they plan, while still ill-defined, look like they might be quite high - and folk in government, publicly and privately, are leaning into making that point.

Farage picked a scrap with them in his interview with me, and the government is hitting back.

Do Delo and Harborne clear them, and if they don't, for how long could that delay Reform getting hold of their vast sums of money?

The Reform UK leader has threatened that a Reform government would cut off party funding from the trades unions if the government went ahead with trying to limit his capacity to raise money from these two donors.

Labour received £5m from affiliated unions last year and £12m the year before, in 2024, the year of the last general election.

So, there are loads of questions that tumble towards us after these donations.

Should there be a limit on the proportion of a party's funding that can come from one individual?

Should there be a limit on what donors based in the UK can give per year, as well as a cap on donations from Brits abroad?

The General Secretary of the Unite union has suggested a domestic cap somewhere between £500,000 and £1m a year. Some argue this would compel parties to find their funding via lots of small donations rather than fewer giant ones. But it could also prompt some to call for state funding of political parties – ie taxpayers picking up the tab – which may not prove wildly popular.

Then there is the question of spending limits, in addition to donation limits, between elections on the top of the existing limits that do apply just before elections.

If I am leaving you with the impression that these donations to Reform, and in particular their scale, are transforming the debates at Westminster about politics and money, well - they are.

And yes, all of the political parties are aware of their own narrow, self interest in all of this - as well as their own sense of the wider good. %!s()

If you missed Parke’s viral collegiate drop, here’s your second chance to get the popular logo sweatshirt. The influencer brand, founded by Chelsea Parke Goles, is back with its Fall 2026 collection, and it’s trading the collegiate color palette for a lineup that feels decidedly more September: Matcha, Spiced Cola, Burgundy Mulled Wine, and a warm Butterum shade.

Parke has been teasing the collection over the past few days, and fans are already eyeing what they’ll wear once fall officially kicks into gear. The new pieces keep the brand’s familiar varsity-inspired silhouettes, but the colors make them feel fresh for the season ahead.

When Does Parke’s Fall 2026 Collection Come Out?

Parke’s Fall 2026 collection drops Sept. 15 at 10 a.m. ET/7 a.m. PST online. If you missed the collegiate collection, this is your opportunity to get in before the latest pieces potentially become just as difficult to snag.

The timing is pretty ideal, too. September is when the fantasy of fall dressing starts becoming a reality, and Parke’s new lineup is full of the kind of cozy staples that can carry you through the awkward period between “it’s still 75 degrees” and “where did I put my coat?”

What Pieces Are In Parke’s Fall 2026 Collection?

The Varsity Mockneck is the star of the new lineup, arriving in both Matcha and Spiced Cola. The muted green is also used for a striped T-shirt and relaxed lounge pants, which can be worn together or mixed into the rest of your fall rotation.

Sell-out risk

Parke Varsity Mockneck

Parke’s latest fall shades were revealed in a sneak peek earlier this month, and they are predicted to be some of the first to sell out. Pricing for the collegiate drop ranged from $130+ and this collection is expected to be priced similarly.

For something deeper, the Burgundy Mulled Wine Mockneck Zip-Up brings a rich wine shade to the collection. It’s the kind of layer that makes sense for chilly mornings, weekend plans, and basically every coffee run between now and November.

Then there’s Butterum, a creamy shade featured on the traditional Varsity Mockneck. Think a softer pumpkin spice/terracotta, but without committing your entire outfit to orange.

What Colors Are In Parke’s Fall Collection?

Matcha is the clear standout, but the collection also includes Spiced, Burgundy Mulled, and Butterum. Together, they give Parke’s familiar varsity staples a distinctly autumnal update without making them feel overly seasonal.

Where Can You Shop Parke’s Fall Collection?

The Fall 2026 collection will be available online starting Sept. 15 at 10 a.m. ET. If you missed the last drop, consider setting an alarm. Parke fans have already shown they’re willing to move quickly for the brand’s most-wanted pieces. Especially if that favorite happens to be matcha. You can find a few tips below on how to make sure you get all your favorites:

• Sign in early. Save yourself the password scramble when the clock hits 10.
• Keep your links open. Bookmark the Parke collection and any must-have pieces below so you can jump straight to them.
• Start refreshing around 9:57 a.m. ET. Don’t wait until exactly 10 to start checking.
• Checkout quickly. Once your favorite is live, add it to your cart and go. There’s always time to browse later, but your size or color may not stick around.

This year, medical drama The Pitt led all nominees with 25, including Outstanding Drama Series, a distinction the show won last year alongside acting wins for stars Noah Wylie and Katherine LaNasa. This year, Wylie, LaNasa, Patrick Ball, Shawn Hatosy, Gerran Howell, Taylor Dearden, Fiona Dourif, and Sepideh Moafi are all nominated for their performances.

Hacks trailed just behind with 24 nominations, and set a record for most Emmy nominations for a single season of TV comedy. Alongside vying for Outstanding Comedy Series, star Jean Smart is looking to win her fifth straight Outstanding lead Actress in a Comedy series prize for her portrayal of Deborah Vance, while Hannah Einbinder is nominated for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Comedy Series, which she won in 2025. 

Two breakout shows earned impressive nominations this year: Pluribus and Widow’s Bay. Widow’s Bay, the macabre  comedy about a cursed New England island, earned 19 nominations, including acting looks for stars Matthew Rhys, Stephen Root, Dale Dickey, and Kate O’Flynn. 

Meanwhile, Pluribus, the post-apocalyptic sci-fi series from Breaking Bad creator Vince Gilligan, garnered 18 nominations. Star Rhea Seehorn is up for an acting Emmy after twice losing for her celebrated turn on Gilligan’s Breaking Bad prequel series, Better Call Saul. Her co-stars Carlos-Manuel Vesga and Karolina Wydra are also nominated for their performances. 

Other notable nominees this year include Beef and DTF St. Louis, which led the Limited Series categories. And perennial Emmy favorites, including Only Murders in the Building, Abbott Elementary, Slow Horses, The Bear, and The Diplomat all picked up nominations.

Check below for the full list of winners (bolded) as they are announced.

Editor’s picks

2026 Emmy Nominations

Outstanding Drama Series
The Diplomat
The Gilded Age
A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms
Paradise
The Pitt
Pluribus
Slow Horses
Your Friends and Neighbors

Outstanding Comedy Series
Abbott Elementary
The Bear
Hacks
Margo’s Got Money Troubles
Nobody Wants This
Only Murders in the Building
Shrinking
Widow’s Bay

Outstanding Limited Or Anthology Series
All Her Fault
The Beast in Me
Beef
DTF St. Louis
Love Story: John F. Kennedy Jr. and Carolyn Bessette

Outstanding Lead Actress In A Drama Series
Carrie Coon, The Gilded Age
Chase Infiniti, The Testaments
Keri Russell, The Diplomat
Rhea Seehorn, Pluribus
Zendaya, Euphoria

Outstanding Lead Actor in a Drama Series
Sterling K. Brown, Paradise
Gary Oldman, Slow Horses
Mark Ruffalo, Task
Rufus Sewell, The Diplomat
Noah Wyle, The Pitt

Outstanding Lead Actor In A Comedy Series
Yahya Abdul-Mateen II, Wonder Man
Steve Carell, Rooster
Matthew Rhys, Widow’s Bay
Jason Segel, Shrinking
Martin Short, Only Murders in the Building

Outstanding Lead Actress In A Comedy Series
Quinta Brunson, Abbott Elementary
Ayo Edebiri, The Bear
Elle Fanning, Margo’s Got Money Troubles
Lisa Kudrow, The Comeback
Jean Smart, Hacks

Outstanding Lead Actress In A Limited Or Anthology Series Or Movie
Claire Danes, The Beast in Me
Sally Field, Remarkably Bright Creatures
Carey Mulligan, Beef
Sarah Pidgeon, Love Story: John F. Kennedy Jr. and Carolyn Bessette
Sarah Snook, All Her Fault

Related Content

Outstanding Lead Actor In A Limited Or Anthology Series Or Movie
Riz Ahmed, Bait
Jason Bateman, Black Rabbit
Charlie Hunnam, Monster: The Ed Gein Story
Oscar Isaac, Beef
Matthew Rhys, The Beast in Me

Outstanding Supporting Actor In A Drama Series
Patrick Ball, The Pitt
Billy Crudup, The Morning Show
Shawn Hatosy, The Pitt
Gerran Howell, The Pitt
Tom Pelphrey, Task
Carlos-Manuel Vesga, Pluribus

Outstanding Supporting Actress In A Drama Series
Taylor Dearden, The Pitt
Fiona Dourif, The Pitt
Allison Janney, The Diplomat
Katherine LaNasa, The Pitt
Julianne Nicholson, Paradise
Karolina Wydra, Pluribus

Outstanding Supporting Actor In A Comedy Series
Paul W. Downs, Hacks
Colman Domingo, Four Seasons
Harrison Ford, Shrinking
Nick Offerman, Margo’s Got Money Troubles
Michael Urie, Shrinking
Tyler James Williams, Abbott Elementary

Outstanding Supporting Actress In A Comedy Series
Hannah Einbinder, Hacks
Dale Dickey, Widow’s Bay
Kate O’Flynn, Widow’s Bay
Janelle James, Abbott Elementary
Megan Stalter, Hacks
Jessica Williams, Shrinking

Outstanding Supporting Actress In A Limited Or Anthology Series Or Movie
Linda Cardellini, DTF St. Louis
Dakota Fanning, All Her Fault
Joy Sunday, DTF St. Louis
Laurie Metcalf, Monster: The Ed Gein Story
Constance Zimmer, Love Story: John F. Kennedy Jr. and Carolyn Bessette

Outstanding Supporting Actor In A Limited Or Anthology Series Or Movie
Jason Bateman, DTF St. Louis
Richard Gadd, Half Man
David Harbour, DTF St. Louis
Nick Offerman, Death by Lightning
Richard Jenkings, DTF St. Louis

Trending Stories

Outstanding Reality Competition Program
Dancing With the Stars
RuPaul’s Drag Race
Survivor
Top Chef
The Traitors

Outstanding Variety Series
The Daily Show
Jimmy Kimmel Live!
Last Week Tonight With John Oliver
The Late Show With Stephen Colbert
Saturday Night Live %!s()